the product

Capture, assess, cite, coach. The same bar every time, with evidence behind every number.

PL-300 · Data Analyst · Day 2
assessing
Transcript
00:41:52Let's look at how CALCULATE works.
00:42:11CALCULATE overrides all filter context.
00:42:20…so the measure ignores the slicer.
00:42:39We'll confirm that in the model view.
Flagged · cited

Overstated. CALCULATE modifies filter context; filters on other columns persist unless overridden.

Microsoft Learn · DAX filter context
Assessment3.3/5
Technical accuracy3/5
Clarity3/5
Pedagogy4/5
Trainer trajectory+0.4 · 6 deliveries
01Capture

It joins the room

The Agentic Trainer sits in your Microsoft Teams or Google Meet delivery as a participant, records its own audio, and transcribes it, copyright-safe and hands-free. Multi-day courses are captured day by day, each session queued for assessment automatically.

02Assess

Graded to a master-trainer bar

Each session is scored against a fixed rubric of technical accuracy, clarity and pedagogy, anchored to the full Microsoft Learn corpus for that course. The bar is identical every time, so scores compare cleanly across trainers and deliveries.

Technical accuracy3/5
Clarity3/5
Pedagogy4/5
03Cite

It shows its work

Every score carries its evidence: the exact timestamp, the words the trainer said, and the corpus fact behind the mark. A lead-assessor pass settles borderline calls, so a 3 is a 3 for a reason. No wobble, no guesswork.

PL-300 · Day 2 · DAX
assessed
Technical accuracy3/5
cited to the transcript

00:42:11 · “CALCULATE overrides all filter context.”

Overstated. CALCULATE modifies filter context; filters on other columns persist.

Microsoft Learn · DAX filter context
04Coach

It coaches forward

TrainAgent briefs the trainer before the next delivery, names the single highest-leverage thing to improve, and tracks the trajectory. Quality stops being a feeling and becomes a curve that climbs.

Trainer trajectory+1.3 over 8 deliveries
delivery 1delivery 8
the rubric

Two pillars behind every assessment

System knowledge, the full Microsoft Learn corpus for the course, plus a rubric grounded in real pedagogy. Both are required; a fluent explanation of the wrong thing still fails on accuracy.

Technical accuracy

Is what's taught correct against Microsoft Learn? Overstatements, omissions and errors are caught and cited, with a safety pass so transcription noise never becomes a false mark.

“RA-GRS replicates synchronously.” → flagged: RA-GRS is asynchronous.

Clarity

Are concepts explained so a learner can follow, with structure, analogy and checks for understanding, not just technically present in the room.

Introduced DAX filter context with a worked before/after example.

Pedagogy

Grounded in 21st Century Learning Design: does the delivery build real capability, not just cover slides?

Learners applied the skill in a guided lab, not just watched.

See it on your own delivery.

Start the conversation